Abstract Strategy
Style712 games in this category
Spiele in dieser Kategorie
Alhambra: Big Box Special Edition
2014
7,47
2-6 Spieler
45 min
2,00/5
Qwirkle Trio
2012
7,09
2-4 Spieler
45 min
1,25/5
Tschach
1989
6,81
2 Spieler
120 min
1,62/5
Playing With Pyramids
2002
7,36
2-8 Spieler
2,31/5
Yōkaï no Mori
2013
6,89
2 Spieler
15 min
2,27/5
New Rules for Classic Games
1992
7,46
1-4 Spieler
2,00/5
Ingenious Challenges
2010
5,87
2-4 Spieler
30 min
1,38/5
A Gamut of Games
1969
7,77
1-10 Spieler
30 min
2,32/5
Patchwork
2014
8,13
2 Spieler
15-30 min
3,85/5
Azul
2017
7,72
2-4 Spieler
30-45 min
1,78/5
Patchwork
2014
7,58
2 Spieler
15-30 min
1,60/5
YINSH
2003
7,71
2 Spieler
30-60 min
2,63/5
Samurai
1998
7,48
2-4 Spieler
30-60 min
2,44/5
Durch die Wüste
1998
7,18
2-5 Spieler
45 min
2,16/5
Einfach Genial
2004
7,10
1-4 Spieler
45 min
1,91/5
TZAAR
2007
7,67
2 Spieler
30-60 min
2,48/5
DVONN
2001
7,45
2 Spieler
30 min
2,65/5
Mexica
2002
7,24
2-4 Spieler
90 min
2,68/5
Torres
1999
7,08
2-4 Spieler
60 min
2,85/5
Blokus
2000
6,86
2-4 Spieler
20 min
1,73/5
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Abstract strategy games have minimal or no theme, no hidden information, and no randomness. Victory depends entirely on player skill and decision-making. Classic examples include Chess, Go, and Checkers. Modern abstracts like Azul, Hive, and YINSH combine pure strategy with elegant components and faster play times.
Great modern abstracts include Azul (tile drafting mosaic), Hive (insect-themed piece placement), Santorini (3D building and Greek gods), Patchwork (two-player quilting puzzle), YINSH (part of the GIPF project), and Onitama (simplified Chess with rotating move cards).
Abstract strategy games develop pure logical thinking because there is no luck to blame and no hidden information to guess about. Every outcome results from player decisions. They build pattern recognition, spatial reasoning, and the ability to think multiple moves ahead — skills that transfer to other strategy games and real-world problem solving.